1975 Austin Princess vs. 2010 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2010 Smart ForTwo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin Princess would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Austin Princess weights approximately 320 kg more than 2010 Smart ForTwo.
Because 2010 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Austin Princess | 2010 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Austin | Smart |
| Model | Princess | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 1867 mm |
