1975 Austin Princess vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin Princess would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 754 kg more than 1975 Austin Princess.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Austin Princess | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Princess | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 548 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1914 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1884 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2880 mm |
