1975 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 1978 Volvo 66 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 1,289 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Volvo 66 (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1975 Autobianchi A 112. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 1975 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1978 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Volvo 66 (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Autobianchi A 112. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1978 Volvo 66 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Autobianchi A 112.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Autobianchi A 112 | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Autobianchi | Volvo |
Model | A 112 | 66 |
Year Released | 1975 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 903 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 63 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1550 mm |