1975 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1983 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1275 kg more than 1975 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1983 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Autobianchi A 112 | 1983 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Cadillac |
| Model | A 112 | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1975 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 5032 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3090 mm |
