1975 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak (820 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 757 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Autobianchi A 112. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Autobianchi A 112.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Autobianchi A 112 | 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 112 | Kodiak |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 6600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 63 Nm | 820 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2000 mm |
