1975 BMW 1502 vs. 1953 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1975 BMW 1502 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 BMW 1502 (73 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 BMW 1502 should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Jeep CJ weights approximately 136 kg more than 1975 BMW 1502.
Because 1953 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 BMW 1502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Jeep CJ (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 BMW 1502. (118 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1953 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 BMW 1502.
Compare all specifications:
1975 BMW 1502 | 1953 Jeep CJ | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 1502 | CJ |
Year Released | 1975 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1573 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2040 mm |