1975 BMW 1502 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1975 BMW 1502 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1975 BMW 1502. (73 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1975 BMW 1502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1975 BMW 1502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1975 BMW 1502 has manual transmission. 1975 BMW 1502 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1975 BMW 1502 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 1502 | 62 |
Year Released | 1975 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1573 cc | 6382 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 2200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 79 L |