1975 BMW 1602 vs. 1952 Saab 92
To start off, 1975 BMW 1602 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,574 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 BMW 1602 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 BMW 1602 (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 BMW 1602 should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 BMW 1602 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1952 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 BMW 1602 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 BMW 1602. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 BMW 1602 | 1952 Saab 92 | |
Make | BMW | Saab |
Model | 1602 | 92 |
Year Released | 1975 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1574 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2480 mm |