1975 BMW 1602 vs. 1954 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1975 BMW 1602 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 BMW 1602 (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 BMW 1602 should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Jeep CJ weights approximately 100 kg more than 1975 BMW 1602.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 BMW 1602. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 BMW 1602. (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 BMW 1602.
Compare all specifications:
1975 BMW 1602 | 1954 Jeep CJ | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 1602 | CJ |
Year Released | 1975 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1574 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2060 mm |