1975 BMW 1602 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1975 BMW 1602 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1975 BMW 1602. (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1975 BMW 1602. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 265 kg more than 1975 BMW 1602. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 BMW 1602. (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 BMW 1602.
Compare all specifications:
1975 BMW 1602 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | BMW | Triumph |
Model | 1602 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1975 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1574 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2700 mm |