1975 BMW 1602 vs. 1968 Mazda R-100
To start off, 1975 BMW 1602 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 1,963 cc, 1968 Mazda R-100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda R-100 (110 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1975 BMW 1602. (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda R-100 should accelerate faster than 1975 BMW 1602. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 BMW 1602 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mazda R-100 (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 BMW 1602. (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1968 Mazda R-100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 BMW 1602.
Compare all specifications:
1975 BMW 1602 | 1968 Mazda R-100 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 1602 | R-100 |
Year Released | 1975 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1574 cc | 1963 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2270 mm |