1975 BMW 1602 vs. 1984 Zastava 750
To start off, 1984 Zastava 750 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 BMW 1602 would be higher. At 1,574 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 BMW 1602 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 BMW 1602 (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1984 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 BMW 1602 should accelerate faster than 1984 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 BMW 1602 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1984 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 BMW 1602 (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1975 BMW 1602 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
1975 BMW 1602 | 1984 Zastava 750 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | 1602 | 750 |
Year Released | 1975 | 1984 |
Engine Size | 1574 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 55 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2010 mm |