1975 BMW 1602 vs. 1998 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 1998 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 BMW 1602 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1975 BMW 1602. (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1975 BMW 1602.
Because 1975 BMW 1602 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 BMW 1602. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Oldsmobile SS (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 BMW 1602. (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1998 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 BMW 1602.
Compare all specifications:
1975 BMW 1602 | 1998 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
Model | 1602 | SS |
Year Released | 1975 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1574 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1900 mm |