1975 BMW 1602 vs. 2009 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2009 Lincoln MKS is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 BMW 1602 would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Lincoln MKS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lincoln MKS (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1975 BMW 1602. (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln MKS should accelerate faster than 1975 BMW 1602.
Because 2009 Lincoln MKS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 BMW 1602. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln MKS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lincoln MKS (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 BMW 1602. (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Lincoln MKS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 BMW 1602.
Compare all specifications:
1975 BMW 1602 | 2009 Lincoln MKS | |
Make | BMW | Lincoln |
Model | 1602 | MKS |
Year Released | 1975 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1574 cc | 3724 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 72 L |