1975 BMW 320 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1975 BMW 320. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1975 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 250 kg more than 1975 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 BMW 320. (174 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 BMW 320 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 320 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 75 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2490 mm |
