1975 BMW 520 vs. 2002 Tata E
To start off, 2002 Tata E is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 BMW 520 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Tata E (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1975 BMW 520. (123 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Tata E should accelerate faster than 1975 BMW 520. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Tata E weights approximately 75 kg more than 1975 BMW 520. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Tata E (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 BMW 520. (172 Nm @ 4350 RPM). This means 2002 Tata E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 BMW 520.
Compare all specifications:
1975 BMW 520 | 2002 Tata E | |
Make | BMW | Tata |
Model | 520 | E |
Year Released | 1975 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4350 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2810 mm |