1975 Bristol 411 vs. 2000 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2000 Cadillac XLR is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Bristol 411. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Bristol 411 would be higher. At 6,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Bristol 411 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac XLR (301 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1975 Bristol 411. (288 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1975 Bristol 411. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Bristol 411 weights approximately 56 kg more than 2000 Cadillac XLR.
Let's talk about torque, 1975 Bristol 411 (588 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Cadillac XLR. (428 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1975 Bristol 411 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Cadillac XLR.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Bristol 411 | 2000 Cadillac XLR | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | 411 | XLR |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6277 cc | 4565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 588 Nm | 428 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1654 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1290 mm |
