1975 Cadillac Calais vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 8,192 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Cadillac Calais (180 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 925 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Cadillac Calais | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Calais | 6 |
Year Released | 1975 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8192 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 2305 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 4690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2680 mm |