1975 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1968 Volvo 145
To start off, 1975 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 8,192 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Cadillac DeVille (180 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 145. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 970 kg more than 1968 Volvo 145. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Volvo 145 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 145. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Cadillac DeVille | 1968 Volvo 145 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | DeVille | 145 |
Year Released | 1975 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8192 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2260 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2620 mm |