1975 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 8,192 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Cadillac DeVille (180 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 570 kg more than 2002 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Cadillac DeVille | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DeVille | Ranger |
Year Released | 1975 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8192 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2290 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3010 mm |