1975 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2003 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 8,192 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1975 Cadillac DeVille. (180 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1975 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 865 kg more than 2003 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | DeVille | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8192 cc | 1308 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 8200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2290 kg | 1425 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2710 mm |
