1975 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1963 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1975 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 8,192 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Cadillac Eldorado (180 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1751 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Cadillac Eldorado | 1963 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | Eldorado | Elan |
Year Released | 1975 | 1963 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8192 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2345 kg | 594 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3220 mm | 2140 mm |