1975 Chevrolet Nova vs. 2003 Mazda 6

To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 5,002 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Chevrolet Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Chevrolet Nova (143 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Chevrolet Nova should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Chevrolet Nova weights approximately 210 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1975 Chevrolet Nova is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Chevrolet Nova. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Chevrolet Nova (333 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 1975 Chevrolet Nova will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications: