1975 Chevrolet Nova vs. 2004 Mazda 3

To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 5,002 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Chevrolet Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1975 Chevrolet Nova. (143 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1975 Chevrolet Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Chevrolet Nova weights approximately 273 kg more than 2004 Mazda 3.

Because 1975 Chevrolet Nova is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Chevrolet Nova. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Chevrolet Nova (333 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 3. (203 Nm). This means 1975 Chevrolet Nova will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

1975 Chevrolet Nova 2004 Mazda 3
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Nova 3
Year Released 1975 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5002 cc 2260 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 143 HP 160 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 333 Nm 203 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1555 kg 1282 kg
Vehicle Length 5000 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2650 mm