1975 Chrysler 160 vs. 1955 DKW Munga
To start off, 1975 Chrysler 160 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Chrysler 160 (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1955 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1955 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 DKW Munga weights approximately 215 kg more than 1975 Chrysler 160.
Because 1955 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Chrysler 160. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Chrysler 160 (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1975 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Chrysler 160 | 1955 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chrysler | DKW |
Model | 160 | Munga |
Year Released | 1975 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 71 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2010 mm |