1975 Chrysler 160 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,487 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1975 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1975 Chrysler 160.
Because 1975 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (167 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Chrysler 160 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | 160 | 6 |
Year Released | 1975 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2487 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1850 mm |