1975 Chrysler 160 vs. 2009 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2009 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Sequoia (272 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1975 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1975 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Sequoia (315 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Chrysler 160 | 2009 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | 160 | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 4664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 272 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 315 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2040 mm |
