1975 Chrysler Charger vs. 1976 Ford Falcon

To start off, 1976 Ford Falcon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 3,521 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Chrysler Charger (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1976 Ford Falcon. (129 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 1976 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Ford Falcon weights approximately 50 kg more than 1975 Chrysler Charger.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Chrysler Charger (272 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Ford Falcon. (263 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1975 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Ford Falcon.

Compare all specifications:

1975 Chrysler Charger 1976 Ford Falcon
Make Chrysler Ford
Model Charger Falcon
Year Released 1975 1976
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3521 cc 3273 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 138 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 272 Nm 263 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1330 kg 1380 kg
Vehicle Length 4570 mm 4870 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2830 mm