1975 Chrysler Charger vs. 2000 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2000 Dodge Durango is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Durango weights approximately 105 kg more than 1975 Chrysler Charger.
Because 2000 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Chrysler Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Durango (454 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Chrysler Charger. (272 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Chrysler Charger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Chrysler Charger | 2000 Dodge Durango | |
| Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
| Model | Charger | Durango |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3521 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 272 Nm | 454 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1435 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2950 mm |
