1975 Chrysler Charger vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 3,521 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1975 Chrysler Charger. (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1975 Chrysler Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Chrysler Charger weights approximately 45 kg more than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 1975 Chrysler Charger (272 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1975 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Chrysler Charger | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
| Model | Charger | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3521 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 272 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2540 mm |
