1975 Chrysler Charger vs. 2006 Ford E-150
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1975 Chrysler Charger. (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1975 Chrysler Charger.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Chrysler Charger. (272 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Chrysler Charger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Chrysler Charger | 2006 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Charger | E-150 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3521 cc | 4604 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 272 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3510 mm |
