1975 Chrysler Charger vs. 2006 Rover 75

To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 118 more horse power than 1975 Chrysler Charger. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1975 Chrysler Charger.

Because 1975 Chrysler Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Chrysler Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Chrysler Charger (272 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 75. (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1975 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 75.

Compare all specifications:

1975 Chrysler Charger 2006 Rover 75
Make Chrysler Rover
Model Charger 75
Year Released 1975 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3521 cc 4601 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 138 HP 256 HP
Torque 272 Nm 245 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4570 mm 4800 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2750 mm