1975 Chrysler Charger vs. 2010 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2010 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 3,521 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Chrysler Charger (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2010 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 2010 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 1975 Chrysler Charger (272 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1975 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Chrysler Charger | 2010 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Proton |
| Model | Charger | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 3521 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 272 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2610 mm |
