1975 Chrysler Valiant vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Chrysler Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Chrysler Valiant would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Chrysler Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Chrysler Valiant (227 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Chrysler Valiant should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 1975 Chrysler Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Chrysler Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Chrysler Valiant (461 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 1975 Chrysler Valiant will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Chrysler Valiant | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Valiant | FTO |
| Year Released | 1975 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5210 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 461 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1300 mm |
