1975 Chrysler Valiant vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Chrysler Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Chrysler Valiant would be higher. At 3,522 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Chrysler Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1975 Chrysler Valiant. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1975 Chrysler Valiant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 245 kg more than 1975 Chrysler Valiant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Chrysler Valiant. (272 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Chrysler Valiant.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Chrysler Valiant | 1996 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Valiant | Clio |
Year Released | 1975 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3522 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 272 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2490 mm |