1975 Chrysler Valiant vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Chrysler Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Chrysler Valiant would be higher. At 3,522 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Chrysler Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Chrysler Valiant (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Chrysler Valiant should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 315 kg more than 1975 Chrysler Valiant.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Chrysler Valiant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Chrysler Valiant (272 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ranger. (207 Nm). This means 1975 Chrysler Valiant will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Chrysler Valiant | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Valiant | Ranger |
Year Released | 1975 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3522 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 272 Nm | 207 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3010 mm |