1975 Chrysler Valiant vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2002 Toyota ES 3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Chrysler Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Chrysler Valiant would be higher. At 1,438 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Chrysler Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Chrysler Valiant weights approximately 130 kg more than 2002 Toyota ES 3.
Because 1975 Chrysler Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Chrysler Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota ES 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Chrysler Valiant | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Valiant | ES 3 |
Year Released | 1975 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1438 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2320 mm |