1975 Chrysler Valiant vs. 2004 Mazda 6

To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Chrysler Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Chrysler Valiant would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Chrysler Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Chrysler Valiant (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Chrysler Valiant should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Chrysler Valiant weights approximately 60 kg more than 2004 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1975 Chrysler Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Chrysler Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Chrysler Valiant (319 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 6. (231 Nm). This means 1975 Chrysler Valiant will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications: