1975 Chrysler Valiant vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Chrysler Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Chrysler Valiant would be higher. At 4,342 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Chrysler Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Chrysler Valiant (200 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (151 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Chrysler Valiant should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 5 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1975 Chrysler Valiant.
Because 1975 Chrysler Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Chrysler Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Chrysler Valiant (355 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 5. (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1975 Chrysler Valiant will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Chrysler Valiant | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Valiant | 5 |
Year Released | 1975 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4342 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1760 mm |