1975 Chrysler Valiant vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Chrysler Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Chrysler Valiant would be higher. At 4,342 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Chrysler Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Chrysler Valiant (200 HP) has 132 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Chrysler Valiant should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Because 1975 Chrysler Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Chrysler Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Chrysler Valiant | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Valiant | Pixo |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4342 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2360 mm |