1975 Citroen CX vs. 1950 Riley RM A
To start off, 1975 Citroen CX is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Citroen CX weights approximately 155 kg more than 1950 Riley RM A.
Because 1950 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Citroen CX | 1950 Riley RM A | |
Make | Citroen | Riley |
Model | CX | RM A |
Year Released | 1975 | 1950 |
Engine Size | 2164 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2870 mm |