1975 Citroen CX vs. 1979 Volvo 164
To start off, 1979 Volvo 164 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Volvo 164 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1975 Citroen CX. (115 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 1975 Citroen CX.
Because 1979 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Volvo 164 (205 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Citroen CX. (178 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1979 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Citroen CX | 1979 Volvo 164 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | CX | 164 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2164 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 178 Nm | 205 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 5610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 3350 mm |
