1975 Citroen CX vs. 1979 Zastava 132

To start off, 1979 Zastava 132 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Citroen CX (115 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1979 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1979 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Citroen CX weights approximately 150 kg more than 1979 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1979 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Citroen CX (178 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1975 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Zastava 132.

Compare all specifications: