1975 Citroen CX vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,905 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Citroen CX (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Citroen CX weights approximately 492 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Citroen CX | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | CX | 102 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1905 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2160 mm |
