1975 Citroen CX vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Citroen CX would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1975 Citroen CX. (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1975 Citroen CX.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Citroen CX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Citroen CX. (161 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Citroen CX | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Citroen | Jeep |
| Model | CX | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1905 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 161 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2380 mm |
