1975 Citroen CX vs. 2004 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Citroen CX (115 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Because 2004 Holden Rodeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Holden Rodeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Citroen CX. (178 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2004 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Citroen CX | 2004 Holden Rodeo | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | CX | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1975 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2164 cc | 2405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 3060 mm |