1975 Citroen CX vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Citroen CX would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 242 more horse power than 1975 Citroen CX. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1975 Citroen CX.
Because 2009 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Citroen CX. (178 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Citroen CX | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | CX | UTE |
Year Released | 1975 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2164 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 178 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |