1975 DAF 66 vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 DAF 66 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 103 more horse power than 1975 DAF 66. (45 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1975 DAF 66.
Because 1975 DAF 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 DAF 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 DAF 66. (75 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
1975 DAF 66 | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
Make | DAF | Honda |
Model | 66 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1975 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 75 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 58 L |