1975 Datsun 260Z vs. 2013 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2013 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Datsun 260Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Datsun 260Z (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2013 Ford Transit Connect. (134 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Datsun 260Z should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford Transit Connect. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Transit Connect weights approximately 489 kg more than 1975 Datsun 260Z.
Because 1975 Datsun 260Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Datsun 260Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Transit Connect, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Datsun 260Z (213 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford Transit Connect. (174 Nm @ 4750 RPM). This means 1975 Datsun 260Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford Transit Connect. 2013 Ford Transit Connect has automatic transmission and 1975 Datsun 260Z has manual transmission. 1975 Datsun 260Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford Transit Connect will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Datsun 260Z | 2013 Ford Transit Connect | |
| Make | Datsun | Ford |
| Model | 260Z | Transit Connect |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2565 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 213 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1589 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4135 mm | 4587 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2113 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 2014 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2911 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.4 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 56 L |
