1975 Datsun 280Z vs. 2007 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2007 Ford Falcon is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1975 Datsun 280Z. (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1975 Datsun 280Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Ford Falcon weights approximately 226 kg more than 1975 Datsun 280Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Datsun 280Z. (221 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2007 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Datsun 280Z. 1975 Datsun 280Z has automatic transmission and 2007 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 2007 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1975 Datsun 280Z will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1975 Datsun 280Z 2007 Ford Falcon
Make Datsun Ford
Model 280Z Falcon
Year Released 1975 2007
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2753 cc 3984 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 150 HP 220 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4900 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 357 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86.1 mm 92.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79 mm 99.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 9.6:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1304 kg 1530 kg
Vehicle Length 4399 mm 4910 mm
Vehicle Width 1631 mm 1880 mm
Wheelbase Size 2304 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 59 L